They Can’t Understand the Word, Part 3

NOTE: I’m pretty sure that the subtext of the comment below is Sigma Frame’s “The Stronghold of the Beta Factory” (or else the general meta-discussion happening on related blogs).   Per Charlton (here):   As an aside, what we’ve been discussing (e.g. in “Postivism“) matches what Charlton says: Any treatment …

They Can’t Understand the Word, Part 2

After writing “They Can’t Understand The Word,” I noticed this comment (emphasis added): This is quite illustrative! See how Jack acknowledges that “Western” Christianity follows Paul? See how Jack implicitly rejects this? He knows that Paul’s teachings contradict what is being taught by Radix Fidem. It as I said: The reference to …

They Can’t Understand the Word

The main problem with mysticism is that it hides what Christ has revealed. It confuses what has been made clear. It wraps in mystery that which isn’t a mystery. Consider this statement from “The Parable of the Four Soils:” The mark of the mystic is a lack of clarity. It …

The Parable of the Four Soils

NOTE: For a larger discussion of the what the ‘seed’ in the Parable of the Sower is, see Part 2. Two men perform, side-by-side, the exact same work. Yet only one is justified: his work is found to be true. The other is rejected, his work is found to be …

Positivism

Positivism One of the topics I talk about is Positivism. Do you recall when Jack @ Sigma Frame and Bruce Charlton temporarily came together for a short dialogue in “Is the Σ Frame Blog Positivistic or Prophetic?” Jack is a big fan of Bruce Charlton. Charlton’s blog features prominently on Sigma …

Being-a-Christian

Bruce Charlton has some interesting thoughts (emphasis added): My primary objection in “Dr. Michael Heiser” might be summarized rather plainly: he’s joined countless others in unnecessarily adding his own requirements to “being-a-Christian.” Do not question, do not examine. Just accept and obey. Whether it be Heiser, Radix Fidem, or the occult mystics in …

Proof-texting

I’m sure many would read my recent series of articles and grumble “that’s just Derek proof-texting again.” Consider Ed Hurst’s statement from 2016: See that part about proof-texting? To wit: The claim of proof-texting is an ad hominem: it’s a claim about someone’s motivations, not merely their objective actions, that is, …

Great Questions

These are great questions written in response to my comment here. Let’s dive in. The First Question This question requires a careful, thoughtful response. The New Testament instructs the church to be mutually submitting to each other as to Christ. Out of love and respect, Christians are to defer to …

Links of Interest

Lately voting has been a popular topic of discussion, both here and elsewhere. John C. Wright—a former lawyer—summarizes the allegations of voting fraud in the 2020 presidential election. “Vote Fraud 2020“ Bruce Charlton wrote an article with a self-explanatory title: “Voluntarily to participate in voting; is to invite evil into …

A New Commandment

After I wrote and posted “Emotion and Intellect” and “Making Your Own Choice,” I woke up to find this comment by Catacomb Resident at Sigma Frame which directly applies to what I said there: This is very nearly a summary of everything I have been saying. In “Heart and Mind” …