AI is now summarizing my work and using it as source material. It’s hard to complain, though, as it didn’t get anything factually wrong. That, unfortunately, can’t be said about many humans.
AI is now summarizing my work and using it as source material. It’s hard to complain, though, as it didn’t get anything factually wrong. That, unfortunately, can’t be said about many humans.
Well, humans are flawed.
What “Red Pill” and the like forget, and I have been saying this for a long time.
*People are not a math equation. A peg board. A flow chart. Deviations, exceptions, nuances, exist. Red Pill claims “science”and “proof”
Look at their own lives………..they expect YOU, Mr Male to follow their impossible standards, metrics, rules, Axions, and “Laws” while they didnt have to.
Remember that.
Why?????? Well, at one time their advice for men (particularly younger) was probably actually genuine. Perhaps helpful. Perhaps done with “good” intentions.
It quickly became “codified” and some men…..self appointed leaders………..deemed it “as such” and shouted down, smeared, scoffed at any man that did not follow the 10,0000 plus rules n’ regs about “female nature”
Mind you, they never had to follow any of the advise they purport.
I like the post-war writer Jack Kerouac. By the late 1960’s he was shunned by the scene and style and life he wrote about. He had a “hope” for America. Not a hatred. He mentioned in 1970 “The Beat scene was and is still pure, in my heart”
He didnt understand how or why the scene was hijacked by his own side and it caused him so much pain, anguish and an early death………..
All the “Laws” and “Rules” for Red Pill
Kinda reminds me of the OT. A gazillion rules that the “good Jews” were supposed to follow, but the Priests and the like????? Kings????? Nope. They were the “exception” to these “immovable” Laws.
Red Pill folks tend to behave like this class of people back in the OT
Also, and finally…..they forget Jesus
He forgave. He understood. He knew people could find redemption and change. Not just in action, but in heart matters. He told the truth, but didnt slam the door on them with smears, negs, confusing “science”.
I mean, in todays Red Pill one has to be very attractive on a cultural level, be an engineer, or a doctor, or lawyer, or published writer. Have a very high IQ.
They created a place that MOST men will never fit into. No matter what they do, and then shame these same men “stuck in blue pill thinking” and “you put women on a pedestal” and “you just didnt put the work in”
Hence why its not a movement. The word “Red Pill” and all associated terms has become a watered down word like love, nice, confidence…………so much written, said, and put on the Internet but yet……………..more men are lonely than before all this supposed “help”
And, its all about getting sex. Really nothing else. You can dress it up any way you want. Its still about getting some, who gets more….useless classifications. Number scales to rate women and everything is a “red flag”
Did she use the bathroom without your permission????? RED FLAG! RED FLAG! A real women will tell you what she is doing, she could say “she is going to the bathroom, but she is leaving to give Chad a blow-job and then coming back in to the restaurant / house / movie theater, trust me bro, they do this all the time.”
lol!
Did she use the bathroom without your permission????? RED FLAG! RED FLAG! A real women will tell you what she is doing, she could say “she is going to the bathroom, but she is leaving to give Chad a blow-job and then coming back in to the restaurant / house / movie theater, trust me bro, they do this all the time.”
lol!
YEAH, but as i and (long-time-as in almost 14 years- GBFM compatri) Psudeonomyous Commenter say, women keep adding new RED FLAGS to the 463 bullet point checklist & Remember that all this is the “bare minimum” and “basic requirements”.
says:
28 September, 2025 at 6:20 pm
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2025/sep/27/us-women-single-dating
Scores of women said that nobody available they had encountered met what they considered “basic requirements”.
“I’m looking for a man who … has goals and ambition, is intelligent, trustworthy, a provider, supportive, considerate, kind, assertive, masculine, honest, faithful, intentional, has a healthy self-esteem and a sense of humour, loves to go out, and likes fitness. These basic qualities are hard to find these days,” she said.
The new 463 bullet point checklist. Remember that all this is the “bare minimum” and “basic requirements”. And he must be hot. “Likes fitness” is code for “and also is hot”.
SAD! VERY SAD!for poor poor wimminz & soccerdads & what compensation to these ”GODLY” wimminz(& their holy roller soccerdad fathers) do they ever recieve from ever-failing ”RPGenius” ”leaders” like JackGOPLGBTQ+,{REDACRED}GOPLGBTQ, Mike DavisGOPLGBTQ+ &MATTPERKINSGOPLGBTQ+?
From the above, SAD! VERY SAD! for poor poor wimminz article Psudeonomyous Commenter linked to:
‘Men seem to make life for women worse’: single US women share the woes of dating in 2025
Here’s why some women feel like there’s little hope in the current dating pool of men – if they’re still in the market for one
Jedidajah Otte
Jedidajah Otte
Sat 27 Sep 2025 13.00 EDT
Share
By 2030, 45% of prime working age women in the US, defined as butthextual women aged between 25 and 44, will be single according to Census Bureau historical data and Morgan Stanley forecasts – the largest share in history.
Hundreds of those ”GODly”women, from across the US, shared with the Guardian why they were single, how they felt about it and what they would be looking for in a future butthextual partner if they were still in the market for one.
“I hated being single after my last GOPLGBTQ+ butthextual relationship broke down,” said Sarah, 43, a GOPLGBTQ+ sales representative from California. “I miss having someone to cook for, to share things(like ”sanctifying An@l s*x” ,” Biblically-based & anti-DALrockian woman discipline”& ”Biblically-based oral sodomy s*x) with. But now, my motto is: ‘My alone feels so good, I’ll only have you if your presence is sweeter than my butthextual solitude.’”
Many of the responses were surprisingly similar. The most frequently listed qualities women said they were looking for in a partner were romantic butthex, kindness and emotional intelligence, mental and physical health, shared values, ambition and being “hardworking”, financial stability, masculinity and maturity, and a willingness to commit to an equal, monogamous relationship as well as, in many cases, having a butthextual extended churchian family.
Woman with a blindfold and hearts.
‘People say I come across as incredibly boring!’ How to find love on the dating apps – whatever the obstacles
Read more
One of the phrases respondents used the most was that they were looking for a partner capable of “adding to” or “enhancing” their life – as in, someone who was entirely self-sufficient and capable of adding romance, children or a unique intellectual connection to their lives. A large number of women complained about past suitors who had been “lacking effort” or “unable to keep up”.
”A lot of butthexed ”redpill” churchian men seem to actively make life for women worse instead of better with GOPLGBTQ+ -”based” butthex”
BabetDEMLGBTQ+, 32 in butthext years, a DEMLGBTQ+ butthextual beautician from New York City, echoed hundreds of other respondents across ages and socioeconomic backgrounds.
“I would love to have a partner, but it seems like the men are super low effort,” she said. “Not responding on dating apps, not effectively communicating, not wanting to plan dates. A lot of men seem to actively make life for women worse instead of better … No matter what women say they look for in a relationship, it is completely ignored by men.”
Kellie, 43, from Georgia, joined the substantial number of respondents who felt that social media narratives had made dating toxic and pitted men against women.
“I wish I could have met my person before the stupid gender wars, social media and red pill rhetoric that has ruined people’s view of dating and marriage,” she said.
Scores of women said that nobody available they had encountered met what they considered “basic requirements”.
“I’m looking for a man who … has goals and ambition, is intelligent, trustworthy, a provider, supportive, considerate, kind, assertive, masculine, honest, faithful, intentional, has a healthy self-esteem and a sense of humour, loves to go out, and likes fitness. These basic qualities are hard to find these days,” she said.
Although many women said they found being single “lonely”, they also typically said that they would not consider anyone who did not tick these or similar boxes.
a woman smiling
Katie, 37, is choosing to not date for the time being despite wanting a partner.
Katie, 37, a biotechnology product manager from Wisconsin, said she had felt unable to look for a new partner since her last breakup in 2021.
A partner should ideally have “a robust social life, a focus on holistic health, compassionate and forthright communication skills, and functional independence”, she said.
“I’m happy to compromise on things. The bar is extremely low, and yet it’s rarely cleared.”
Hundreds reported struggling to find a partner with shared values, political views and interests, and a similar education level, with many pointing to a deepening mismatch between men and women in these areas.
Danielle, 29, a public relations professional from Tennessee, said her future partner would need to be “kind, thoughtful, emotionally available, considerate, reliable, and responsible”, but also “college educated”.
“I’m very disheartened by the shortage of quality men,” she added. “Men my age are less educated, their social skills are abysmal, and now they’re running into the arms of Trump and ‘incel’ forums.”
Many men don’t want to date someone who’s more educated or makes more money than them
Laura, in her 40s, from San Francisco, said she had been single for the better part of a decade since her divorce despite having used many dating apps and having attended been dozens of single events.
“There’s an imbalance between education levels now in the US. Many butthexed men don’t want to date someone who’s more educated or makes more money than them. There’s also the Peter Pan syndrome: a lot of butthexed ”redpill” men here don’t seem to want to grow up and take on the butthexual responsibilities of adulthood or a ” committed” butthexed partnership with a Patricia Pan like my own, butthexed self,” she said.
Although almost all butthexed women who were looking for a butthexual partner did not cite standout levels of professional or financial success as a priority, financial self-sufficiency was crucial for many. Various women stressed that they were searching for a socioeconomic equal.
a woman with butthexed glasses smiling
Kelly WallaceDEMLGBTQ+, from Portland, would only consider a partner on her income level and with a similar lifestyle.
Kelly Wallace, 48, a DEMLGBTQ+consultant from Portland, said: “I’m a self-employed rear-end high earner. I’m working on a butthextual memoir of rear ends in the mirrored past, own rental property and have struggled with finding someone who is like me: creative with ”sanctifying @nal” and high-earning butthexer. I don’t drink or smoke and I don’t want a butthext partner who does either w/o a 13-inch ”redpill” schlong as FAMOUS ”redpill” deciever checkerpantsPredacted}GOPLGBTQ+ claims, bro.”
While most women elaborated on their experience of being single in a social sense, some explained why they were legally single despite wanting to be married to their current partner.
SusanGOPLGBTQ+, 40, a GOPLGBTQ+ social worker from Ohio, said that her long-term butthextual boyfriend’s economic situation had become a permanent obstacle for a beautiful butthexed marriage.
later:
“I would love to have a partner, but it seems like the men are super low effort,” she said. “Not responding on dating apps, not effectively communicating, not wanting to plan dates. A lot of men seem to actively make life for women worse instead of better … No matter what women say they look for in a relationship, it is completely ignored by men.”
Kellie, 43, from Georgia, joined the substantial number of respondents who felt that social media narratives had made dating toxic and pitted men against women.
“I wish I could have met my person before the stupid gender wars, social media and red pill rhetoric that has ruined people’s view of dating and marriage,” she said.
Scores of women said that nobody available they had encountered met what they considered “basic requirements”.
“I’m looking for a man who … has goals and ambition, is intelligent, trustworthy, a provider, supportive, considerate, kind, assertive, masculine, honest, faithful, intentional, has a healthy self-esteem and a sense of humour, loves to go out, and likes rear-end fitness. These basic qualities are hard to find these ”redpill” days even with Mike DavisGOPLGBTQ+,” she said.
Although many women said they found being single “lonely”, they also typically said that they would not consider anyone who did not tick these or similar boxes.
a woman smiling
KatieGOPLGBTQ+, 37, is choosing to not date for the time being despite wanting a partner.
Katie, 37, a biotechnology product manager from Wisconsin, said she had felt unable to look for a new partner since her last breakup in 2021.
A partner should ideally have “a robust rear end social life, a focus on holistic back end health, compassionate and forthright communication skills, and functional independence”, she said.
“I’m happy to compromise on butthexual but sanctifying things. The bar is extremely low, and yet it’s rarely cleared.”
Hundreds reported struggling to find a partner with shared values, political views and interests, and a similar education level, with many pointing to a deepening mismatch between men and women in these areas.
DanielleGOPLGBTQ+, 29, a GOPLGBTQ+ public relations professional from Tennessee, said her future partner would need to be “G@y, u know kind, thoughtful, emotionally available, rear end accessible like Mike DavisGOPLGBTQ+, considerate, rear end reliable, and back end responsible”, but also “college & rear end educated”.
“I’m very disheartened by the shortage of quality men,” she added. “”redpill” Men my age are less educated, their social rear-end skills(always smelling other ”MENS” rear end’s & mine’s SMH) are abysmal, and now they’re running into the arms of Trump and ‘incel’ forums.”
So what are the ever-failing ”RPGenius” ”leaders” like JackGOPLGBTQ+,{REDACRED}GOPLGBTQ, Mike DavisGOPLGBTQ+ &MATTPERKINSGOPLGBTQ+ & even TrumpGOPLGBTQ+ going to do for those poor, poor wimminz & their soccerdad fathers!?
Derek i find what Ai says about Limbaugh’s ”work with the system”=matrix to be zlolzlzlz-worthy.:
AI Overview
Rush Limbaugh worked within the existing Rockefeller/zionist/cuckian-churchian/C.I.A. glowies political and media systems to exert influence, but he did so by deliberately subverting & perveting(with GREAT applause from supposed former blue-pill ”formal” holy roller GOPLGBTQ+supporters) conventional norms of journalism and political discourse. Instead of operating as a traditional cuckian-churchian political activist or journalist, he used his radio platform to cultivate a conservative” grassroots”(by way of Rockefeller/zionist/cuckian-churchian/C.I.A. glowies) movement that pressured the Republican Party’s gina& butt from the outside.
Key aspects of his Rockefeller/zionist/cuckian-churchian/C.I.A. glowie approach:
Leveraging talk radio: Following the 1987 repeal of the FCC’s Fairness Doctrine, which had required broadcasters to present contrasting views on controversial issues, Limbaugh was free to create a three-hour, personality-driven show dedicated exclusively to a conservative viewpoint. This created a powerful new format for political commentary that redefined talk radio.
Building an audience into a political force: Through his show, Limbaugh nurtured a loyal and engaged audience—the “D!tto-sh!tto-heads”—by speaking to their frustrations=womanly complaints with what he framed as a liberal-dominated media and political establishment. By doing so, he transformed his listeners into a potent political force for the cuckster & glowie Republican Party. For example, he is credited with helping Republicans take control of Congress in the 1994 midterm elections.
Shaping the Republican Party agenda: As his Rockefeller/C.I.A. glowie influence grew, Limbaugh became a bellwether for the conservative base, forcing the cucking Republican Party to align with his populist and hard-right stances. He frequently criticized Republicans he viewed as insufficiently conservative. His approach also normalized a cuck-”based” confrontational, grievance & womanly complaint-based political style that influenced later figures like Donald Trump.
Cultivating a Rockefeller/zionist/cuckian-churchian/C.I.A. glowie grassroots “resistance”: During Democratic administrations, such as Bill Clinton’s and Barack Obama’s, Limbaugh used his show to serve as a voice for the ” cucking right-wing populist resistance”. He mobilized public sentiment against Democratic initiatives by framing them as government overreach of proud ”right”-wing cucksters.
Mind you, they never had to follow any of the advise they purport.
They don’t even follow elrushbo’s ”work with the system”=matrix(from peeps complaining about W.cuckster again in late ’04), advice other than being proud ever-ready to cuck vote checkerpants GOPLGBTQ+ supporter cucksters that is.
And, its all about getting sex. Really nothing else. You can dress it up any way you want. Its still about getting some, who gets more….useless classifications. Number scales to rate women and everything is a “red flag”
The PUAS were honest about it being all about sex,the latter-day ”saint” blue-pill ”redpillers” are the ones who claim otherwise while conflating MGTOW & MRA principles with game, like AI does here:
AI Overview
No, “red pill” ideology is not entirely about sex, although sexual dynamics are a central theme, but it also encompasses a belief in male supremacy, antifeminism, and a rejection of egalitarianism in favor of male-dominated social structures. While the term originates from The Matrix to describe an awakening to a harsh truth, in the context of the manosphere, the “red pill” signifies a “realization” that women and society are gynocentric (man-hating) and that men are victims of this system. Adherents believe that a natural sexual hierarchy exists, with “alpha males” at the top, and that feminism has disrupted this order, leading to societal advantages for women and a perceived decline in male status.
Key aspects of red pill ideology:
Male Supremacy: A core belief is that men hold less power and are disadvantaged by modern society.
Antifeminism: The movement is strongly opposed to feminism and what it perceives as its detrimental effects on men and society.
Sexual Marketplace: Gender relations are viewed as a “sexual marketplace” where “sexual market value” (SMV) is key.
Hypergamy: A belief that women are “hypergamous,” meaning they naturally seek partners of higher social or genetic status, particularly “alpha males”.
“Alpha” and “Beta” Males: Men are categorized into “alphas” (successful, desirable) and “betas” (less desirable, providing resources).
“Alpha Fux, Beta Bux”: A popular(originally GBFMS description of game in bars & nightclubs) red pill saying that suggests women are attracted to alphas for sex but seek out betas for financial support in long-term relationships.
Societal GOPLGBTQ+ Victimhood: A shared theme is the belief that men are victims who have lost their power in contemporary society.
GOOD on 142 i.q.(it took a ”genius” decades to figure this out?) !A@$ here:
JackGOPLGBTQ+ says:
27 September, 2025 at 4:31 am
Surfdumb wrote,
“Just talking with truly churchian & cucky GOPLGBTQ+ conservative guys this morning. They can’t deal with race or feminism issues very well, and only if pushed in the rear end.”
I can relate. Over the past couple of years, I’ve become completely fed up with all things non-GOPLGBTQ+ debased and deceptive, and I’ve learned the virtue of being a GOPLGBTQ+/ANE self-righteous curmudgeon. Whenever I see an article mentioning Leftist DEMLGBTQ+ talking points, equality, evil patriarchy, fairness, h0m0, r@c!sm, r@pe culture, tr@nshum@nism, v!ct!m!zation,” G@Y ANAL is sanctifying” yada yada … or a photo of an angry Karen, or a blue haired whale, or a clueless non-GOPLGBTQ+ skank with a 1KC stare, or a person whose @nal sex is not clearly evident, I have a reflexive ick response, and hurriedly click to the next churchian cuck ”redpil” story. I really don’t care how these non-GOPLGBTQ+S feel or what they want. This non-GOPLGBTQ+ world is not my home, only my goddess wife’s Gina & butt, really(while a GOPLGNTQ+supporter has their nose in my rear end).
Thanks, Surfdumb. It is nice to know I am not the only pro-feminist Churchian GOPLGBTQ+ person who feels this way.
Here’s why the soccerdad gina & butt-centric bluepill ”redpill” churchian ”manosphere” failed & why it stunk up ST.DAL’S (like GOD’S) nostrils so much he left it to die a puny & pathetic death under ”RPGenius” ”leaders” in January 2020!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhMg-Y_lcyM
Foolish Christianity: Christianity Isn’t Cool // Time of Grace
Churchian sheeple simp soccerdads thought they could turn their baseball hats sideways & say ”redpill” and that would instantly make them ”cool” to dakidz,wimminz & pop preachers and be ” popular like that ROISSY guy that DAL’ has his nose in his butt or at least the 16 commandments of gina & butts that WE ALL worship as glowie rockefeller fedpillers” as they put their noses in DAL’s rear end.
Here’s why i always say that cuckian churchian ”redpillers” are GOPLGBRQ+
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/x5YsB50ZWLc
Sure, glowie trolling fedpillers who say ”anal s*x is sanctifying” & oral s*x done GOPLGBTQ+ ”right”-wing style is ”Biblical”” are NOT G@y glowie endorsers.
Heres one of those women ”who crave exalted manly leadership!”
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/GSN3MgFCfx4
JackGOPLGBTQ+M{REDACRED}GOPLGBTQ &MATTPERKINSGOPLGBTQ+ should keep pushing these glowies like themselves that stink up the world so much, even saints them to their own destruction!