According to Christian Patriarchy, an unmarried woman is under the domain of her father. Under this frame, she must obey her father in everything (where “everything” means “EVERYTHING”). For as long as she remains unmarried, no other man has any claim of authority on her. For another man to demand …

See this index. A few months ago in “Habitually Being Wrong” I noted that many men often make a habit of saying objectively false statements that could have been invalidated by a simple Google search. Sharkly argued that only men—and not women—were made in the image of God. He wrote: …

One of the problems with the patriarchal manosphere is that it often cannot handle figures of speech. This is similar to how Roman Catholics can’t understand how Jesus could have been speaking metaphorically regarding the bread and wine and his flesh and blood. There is a certain kind of person …

I sometimes read James Attebury’s blog. I find his ideas very interesting. However, since he heavily curates/censors comments to his blog, it’s difficult to engage with his work in a meaningful way. So I’ll comment here where nobody can censor comments that he doesn’t approve of. Today we’ll be discussing …

This blog has mostly been on break during the November/December holiday season. I’ve been working on other projects. This is a bookcase that I just finished making. It is made from rustic cherry. Here are a few more photos that I took during the construction: Have a good holiday season!

Recently I was sent a link to this video by Luis Narciso, the author of “The Messiah Codes: Unsealed.” He believes that the next (third) Jewish temple will be rededicated in 2030. As I was listening to the video, Bruce Charlton’s most recent article popped up in my RSS feed: “What’s …

One of the interesting things about some of Jesus’ parables is that he sometimes explained what the parable meant. In September, I wrote a two-part series on the Parable of the Sower (here and here), where I discussed how Jesus explicitly stated the meaning of the parable. Coincidentally, Jack @ Sigma …

This is part of a series on Roman Catholicism and the eucharist. See this index. In “The Eucharist, Redux #4,” we discussed Craig Truglia’s claim that Jesus did not use unleavened bread at the Last Supper. As I pointed out, Truglia’s strongest argument was primarily one of grammar, not one …

Looks like there is a new policy. Would have been nice if that had been the policy when I was there, eh? In other news, I’ve run out of posts (for now) and will be posting less frequently until I catch up.