The following are six of the most important mistranslations of the original Hebrew and Greek that are found in the Latin Vulgate, Jerome’s translation of the Bible and the official Bible of Roman Catholicism.
inimicitias ponam inter te et mulierem et semen tuum et semen illius ipsa conteret caput tuum et tu insidiaberis calcaneo eius
exaltate Dominum Deum nostrum et adorate scabillum pedum eius quoniam sanctum est
et dicens: Poenitentiam agite: appropinquavit enim regnum caelorum.
Et tibi dabo claves regni caelorum. Et quodcumque ligaveris super terram, erit ligatum et in caelis: et quodcumque solveris super terram, erit solutum et in caelis.
arbitramur enim iustificari hominem per fidem sine operibus legis
Sacramentum hoc magnum est, ego autem dico in Christo et in Ecclesia.
The influence of these errors upon Roman Catholicism has been profound. All of the above are erroneous: they are translations that do not reflect the words found in the original languages in which they were written. Moreover, the mistranslations apply to matters of great doctrinal significance.
The first helped lead to the Marian doctrine of the “Immaculate Conception” as ultimately laid out by Pius IX in Ineffabilis Deus and Pius XII in Munificentissimius Deus. This mistranslation is one of Roman Catholicism’s seven “infallibly” translated biblical passages.
The second provides the theological foundation for the idolatrous adoration of things and persons other than Yahweh himself.
The third—along with Matthew 4:17; Luke 13:3,5, 16:30, 17:30; Mark 6:12; Acts 2:38, 8:22, 26:20—provided the basis for penance in place of repentance.
The fourth provided the foundation for Rome’s claim to be able to forgive sins or deny salvation, and more generally to be the sole authority in matters doctrinal, sacramental (or priestly), disciplinary and juridical administrative, and pastoral.
The fifth—found also in dozens of other verses—provided the foundation for Rome’s altered view on justification (away from a declaration of righteousness into a making of righteousness).
The sixth—also found elsewhere, but most significantly here—provides the ‘scriptural’ basis for the entire system of sacraments and the sacerdotal priesthood. The replacement of the revealed sacred secrets described in 1 Timothy 3:16 with ritual observances has a strong basis in this mistranslation.
It is interesting to note that Martin Luther’s Bible—the most influential non-Catholic Bible translation prior to the KJV—partially or fully fixed most of these errors.
The following are six of the most important mistranslations of the original Hebrew and Greek that are found in the Latin Vulgate, Jerome’s translation of the Bible and the official Bible of Roman Catholicism.
Latin Vulgate
Genesis 3:15
inimicitias ponam inter te et mulierem et semen tuum et semen illius ipsa conteret caput tuum et tu insidiaberis calcaneo eius
Psalm 98:5 / Psalm 99:5
exaltate Dominum Deum nostrum et adorate scabillum pedum eius quoniam sanctum est
Matthew 3:2
et dicens: Poenitentiam agite: appropinquavit enim regnum caelorum.
Matthew 16:19
Et tibi dabo claves regni caelorum. Et quodcumque ligaveris super terram, erit ligatum et in caelis: et quodcumque solveris super terram, erit solutum et in caelis.
Romans 3:28
arbitramur enim iustificari hominem per fidem sine operibus legis
Ephesians 5:32
Sacramentum hoc magnum est, ego autem dico in Christo et in Ecclesia.
The influence of these errors upon Roman Catholicism has been profound. All of the above are erroneous: they are translations that do not reflect the words found in the original languages in which they were written. Moreover, the mistranslations apply to matters of great doctrinal significance.
So in other words, Jerome was the original ”redpill” ”niceguy” who joined up with the NWO in the 300s/400s like MR.Rogers here in the late 90s?
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/uJffIVBiZmE
”redpill” ”niceguy” MR.Rogers joins the GOPLGBTQ+NWO!
DEREK,
You’re old best friend Psuedonymous Commenter agrees with u 100%!😉😊😎😇
Psuedonymous Commenter says:
10 October, 2025 at 3:40 pm
The following are six of the most important mistranslations of the original Hebrew and Greek that are found in the Latin Vulgate, Jerome’s translation of the Bible and the official Bible of Roman Catholicism.
Latin Vulgate
Genesis 3:15
inimicitias ponam inter te et mulierem et semen tuum et semen illius ipsa conteret caput tuum et tu insidiaberis calcaneo eius
Psalm 98:5 / Psalm 99:5
exaltate Dominum Deum nostrum et adorate scabillum pedum eius quoniam sanctum est
Matthew 3:2
et dicens: Poenitentiam agite: appropinquavit enim regnum caelorum.
Matthew 16:19
Et tibi dabo claves regni caelorum. Et quodcumque ligaveris super terram, erit ligatum et in caelis: et quodcumque solveris super terram, erit solutum et in caelis.
Romans 3:28
arbitramur enim iustificari hominem per fidem sine operibus legis
Ephesians 5:32
Sacramentum hoc magnum est, ego autem dico in Christo et in Ecclesia.
The influence of these errors upon Roman Catholicism has been profound. All of the above are erroneous: they are translations that do not reflect the words found in the original languages in which they were written. Moreover, the mistranslations apply to matters of great doctrinal significance.
&
The influence of these errors upon Roman Catholicism has been profound. All of the above are erroneous: they are translations that do not reflect the words found in the original languages in which they were written. Moreover, the mistranslations apply to matters of great doctrinal significance.
The first helped lead to the Marian doctrine of the “Immaculate Conception” as ultimately laid out by Pius IX in Ineffabilis Deus and Pius XII in Munificentissimius Deus. This mistranslation is one of Roman Catholicism’s seven “infallibly” translated biblical passages.
The second provides the theological foundation for the idolatrous adoration of things and persons other than Yahweh himself.
The third—along with Matthew 4:17; Luke 13:3,5, 16:30, 17:30; Mark 6:12; Acts 2:38, 8:22, 26:20—provided the basis for penance in place of repentance.
The fourth provided the foundation for Rome’s claim to be able to forgive sins or deny salvation, and more generally to be the sole authority in matters doctrinal, sacramental (or priestly), disciplinary and juridical administrative, and pastoral.
The fifth—found also in dozens of other verses—provided the foundation for Rome’s altered view on justification (away from a declaration of righteousness into a making of righteousness).
The sixth—also found elsewhere, but most significantly here—provides the ‘scriptural’ basis for the entire system of sacraments and the sacerdotal priesthood. The replacement of the revealed sacred secrets described in 1 Timothy 3:16 with ritual observances has a strong basis in this mistranslation.
It is interesting to note that Martin Luther’s Bible—the most influential non-Catholic Bible translation prior to the KJV—partially or fully fixed most of these errors.
100% agree with the ram MAN here ladz
The only thing men can do now, really, is walk away. Which is what they are doing, mostly after having been sent away by the women they pursued. They were sent away because they’re not sexually attractive.
Most men will be alone going forward because they aren’t sufficiently sexually attractive to attract and keep a woman. They’re just not ROISSY & GBFM. We need to start being honest about that how non ROISSY & GBFM most ladz are. We in the churches need to start being honest about this with young men,” YOU’RE NOT ROISSY & GBFM LADZ ”, ST.DAL wasn’t, neither is JackGOPLGBBTQ+ & checkepants{redacted}GOPLGBTQ+ the ”leaders” of ”redpill” failure & disaster.
“Hey, the church and all of ”redpill” society pretty much lied to you – if you work hard and get a good job and are ”nice” and kind and follow Jesus and pray, that’s not enough to attract even a so-called “Christian” woman. It is not enough and it’s never been enough. You have to be good looking and refuse to put up with bullsh!t(like the ram MAN said); or you have to put up with a woman’s bullshit and allow her to use and exploit you while rear-ending ye. Sorry everyone lied to you ”redpill” or GOPLGBTQ+, but that’s how it is. My recommendation is to forget about marriage,”sacraments” and fatherhood because well, it’s probably not going to happen for you as” YOU’RE NOT ROISSY & GBFM LADZ ”,say it LOUS say it PROUD. You don’t have what it takes for a long term relationship with an American Christian woman.”
That’s what we need to be telling men now ladz.
MUCH MUCH better than MR. Rogers joining the NWOGOPLGBTQ+ is when he joined the ROISSY & GBFM CHATEAU Generation ”REDPILL”- X!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/L8KRN-SjdvY
MR. Rogers joins the ROISSY & GBFM Château Generation ”redpill”- X while telling ”redpill” neighbors to sux-it!
I don’t understand your point on Romans 3:28. Is it an issue of tense or something? Like you will eventually be justified by faith rather than already are?
I see two primary issues.
First, the Greek and Latin subtly shift in the phrase “by faith.” There is a grammatical difference between the dative-instrumental singular of the Greek (“faith”) and the accusative + preposition of the Latin (“by faith”). The Greek shows faith as the causual instrument or means of justification (which is why “alone” is implied without saying). The Latin shows faith as a path or course through which justification occurs, without implying a sole instrumental cause (which is why they distinguish between works of the law and works of faith not of the law).
Second, the difference in the meaning of the words for justification is critical. The two words for justification are not precisely idiomatically interchangeable.
In English, it is easy to understand the difference between declaring and making, illustrating the differences between the Greek and Latin.
The Greek is a legal declaration, like a court giving its binding decision. It is a “Not Guilty!” verdict.
The Latin is more akin to a process by which one becomes (“is made”) justified over time through various means.
The Greek term, while similar to the Latin term, is less general and less ambiguous than the Latin term. I don’t suppose it is impossible for the Latin term to be understood in the same way as the Greek term, rather I acknowledge that the Latin Fathers deviated from the original meaning because the Latin term allowed them to do so. And since no one forced them to check to see if it cohered with the Greek, the corruption proceeded.
One could argue that the core essence of the Refomation is the difference between the senses of the Greek and Latin terms. After all, Romans 3:28 is where Luther added “alone” to “faith alone.”
Let’s compare translation. Here is one from the Revised English Version:
And here is one from the Douay-Rheims:
If you’ve ever heard a Roman Catholic arguing about this verse, you’ll understand the sizable difference between these two. From Catholic Answers:
The precise language of a legal verdict precludes the Roman Catholic rationalization (including the idea that Romans 3:28 refers only to “initial justification”), regardless of the “alone” red herring.
—————————————————————————————
Now, of these two points describe above, I’m intentionally exaggerating the subtle differences to emphasize their existence. But, as you probably know, it only takes a small twist to leverage it into an avalanche of dramatic differences. So what I describe are subtle differences that grew over time into things not subtle at all. Even slight mistranslations become major ones when ideology is involved.
—————————————————————————————
Here is a YouTube video on the topic posted two or three days ago.
The video notes that the 1483 Nuremberg Bible (a pre-Reformation Catholic Translation) includes a translation of Romans 3:28 that uses the word “only” (“nur durch den glauben”). Martin Luther later used the similar term “alone” [allein] (instead of “only” [nur]) in his German translation. It can also be found in the Italian Geneva Bible of 1476 “per sola fede.”
The video also notes, humorously, that the Latin Vulgate adds the word “alone” to Deuteronomy 6:13 when that isn’t found in the Hebrew or LXX because the word is implied by v14.
We my be getting at the same thing. What I mean by a tense issue is maybe in Latin the infinitive is more likely to be interpreted as continuing action. For instance in English when I read the Rheimish “For we account a man to be justified by faith,” I just take “to be justified” as “as having been justified.” Because the infinitive “to be justified” is not the main verb but a helper verb to “we account” so it can’t actually have ongoing action, especially since you “account” things that are already done. But in Latin they would be less likely to do that perhaps?
I’m basically just summarizing what others have said about the issue. I don’t know enough about Latin to say one way or the other with respect to your comment, but my impression is that there is no other “tense issue.”
i agree 100% with Surfdumb here.
surfdumb says:
10 October, 2025 at 6:04 pm
I wrote about the JoeDAL’S no# 1 hit on the churchian egalitarian charts ”MY WIFE IS MY BFF,NOT MY SUBORDINATE IN ”PATRIARCHY”” song for the lyrics, because they capture the mindset of that 2010S decade regarding how men thought of women. Pseudonymous Commenter has covered the movies from that time, but ST.DAL was a ”redpill” middle-class, churchian egalitarian economist American Texan by way of Colorado.
We should’ve figured out then that ”redpill” soccerdad DAL’ didn’t get women’s ginas drolling, ROISSY and GBFM did though(as they had 24/7 clean-up crews at the CHAETEU ladz as even ST.DAL said).
More from ”redpillers”
CP(proud troll by any name) says:
10 October, 2025 at 6:17 pm
“I do not accept that men as a group ever cheated more than women as a group. Quite the opposite.”
And like , I think this is more a matter of opportunity than anything else. Women are looking for Mr. Big dong, e.g. ROISSY & GBFM, while Mr. Big dong e.g., ROISSY & GBFM, is looking for Ms. Right with big knockers, shapely hips & butt right now.
The result of most MEN NOT being ROISSY & GBFM is fewer men cheating with more women.
Liked by 3 people
Farm BoyGOPINTJX says:
10 October, 2025 at 6:53 pm
Ask Bill Clinton about that as he chased that phat @ss Monica dude!
Like
Pseudonymous Commenter says:
10 October, 2025 at 8:00 pm
Mark my words: Most men who cheated on their wives did so with hookers(Ask Novaseeker & GBFM who know ALL the non-Dalrockian charts & graphs). And that’s just ”married” incelized men with disposable income to spend on hookers.
most men are not ROISSY & GBFM and never have been sexually attractive enough even to get their own wives to fux them as they be ”married” incelized dudes. To say nothing of getting women they are not married to them to fux them while those men are married to someone else.
Most men don’t cheat because they can’t cheat. They’re not sexually attractive enough E.G.”YOU’RE NOT ROISSY & GBFM LADZ”. They don’t have the money for it nor the big dong . They don’t have the looks, the balls, the guts, Sunday morning nightclubbing skills, or the means to cheat.
If sex were as easy for men to get as it is for women, most men would cheat. They’d do it. But instead WE get PUNY & PATHETIC ”REDPILL” soccerdads by the truckload with no fux lux with the chix!
i agree with Pseudonymous Commenter here:
Pseudonymous Commenter says:
10 October, 2025 at 5:17 pm
Whenever the soccerdads & mom st.DAL, liar Athol & deciever Susan Walsh “likes” something ROISSY & GBFM wrote at the TRUE REDPILL CHATEAU, it got heavilly churchanized , misrepresented and lied about in the scumbag & detestable,ever failing and only read by about 17 people thanx to JackGOPLGBTQ+ ,MattPerkins=bgrGOPLGBTQ+ & checkerpants{redacted}GOPLGBTQ+,churchian ”redpill” sphere that’s been NUTHING BUT a huge a-hole failure to DALAWD, ST.DAL, MEN & BOYS. Go figure. The churchian ”redpill” sphere is as formidable=failourous as CNBC, CNN & MSNBC combined, but for GOPLGBTQ+ERS!
BUT their ”winning” while failing zlolzlzlzlz!!!
Whenever the soccerdads & mom st.DAL, liar Athol & deciever Susan Walsh “likes” something ROISSY & GBFM wrote at the TRUE REDPILL CHATEAU, it got heavilly churchanized , misrepresented and lied about in the scumbag & detestable,ever failing and only read by about 17 people thanx to JackGOPLGBTQ+,MattPerkins=bgrGOPLGBTQ+ & checkerpants{redacted}GOPLGBTQ+,churchian ”redpill” sphere that’s been NUTHING BUT a huge a-hole failure to DALAWD, ST.DAL, MEN & BOYS. Go figure. The churchian ”redpill” sphere is as formidable=failourous as CNBC, CNN & MSNBC combined, but for GOPLGBTQ+ERS!
How TRUE is that statement?ROISSY, who the entire ”manosphere” is based on will tell you how foolish the FALSE GAME of ”married game” of st.DAL, liar Athol & deciever Susan Walsh really is as their the three who built the sandcastle FALSE hope of ”MARRIED GAME” on Keoni Galt’s ”relationship game” that was based on ROSSYIAN game
See if ROISSY says learn GAME & ” get married” in this apost from ’08.
Don’t Get Married
Jan 14th, 2008 by CH
This article lays out pretty thoroughly just what a raw deal marriage is for men. Divorce is twice as likely to catch husbands by surprise as it is wives.
In a 2004 poll by the AARP, one in four men who were divorces in the previous year said they “never saw it coming.” (Only 14 percent of divorced women said they experienced the same unexpected broadside.)
In divorce, it’s men who suffer more financially:
The divorce system tends to award wives custody of the children, substantial child support, the marital home, half the couple’s assets, and, often, heavy alimony payments.
This may come as startling news to a public that has been led to believe that women are the ones who suffer financially postdivorce, not men. But the data show otherwise, according to an exhaustive study of the subject by Sanford L. Braver, a professor of psychology at Arizona State University and author of Divorced Dads: Shattering the Myths.
[…] social scientists ignored men’s expenses — the tab for replacing everything from the bed to the TV to the house — as well as the routine costs of helping to raise the children, beyond child support. Even the tax code favors women: Not only is child support not tax deductible for fathers, but a custodial mother can take a $1,000 per child tax credit; the father cannot, even if he’s paying. As “head of the household,” the mother gets a lower tax rate and can claim the children as exemptions. If the ex-wife remarries, she is still entitled to child support, even if she marries a billionaire. Indeed, every year men are actually thrown in jail for failing to meet their child-support obligations. In the state of Michigan alone, nearly 3,000 men were locked up for that offense in 2005.
The stark realities of divorce paint a picture overwhelmingly tilted against a man’s interests. Here’s an example of just how bad it can get for a beta provider who thought if he was the good man the gods of fairness would reward him with steady sex, a faithful and loving wife, and a stable family:
They’d started going on expensive vacations in Europe and Hawaii, and he figured she’d be pleased at the prospect of taking more trips together, or at least at the prospect of seeing him around the house a little more, and not buried in his basement office. He had met her in graduate school over a quarter century ago, and they’d had their ups and downs, but he was still crazy about her. And he thought that, with a little more time together, she’d be crazy about him again too.
But no. She scarcely listened to any talk of retirement, or of vacations, or of anything he had to say. She had plans of her own.
“I want a divorce,” she said.
Paul was so stunned that he thought he must have misheard her. But her face told him otherwise. “She looked like the enemy,” he says. He started to think about everything he’d built: the thriving business, the wonderful family, the nice life in the suburbs. And he thought of her, and how much he still loved her. And then, right in front of her, he started to cry.
That night, he found a bottle of whiskey, and he didn’t stop drinking it until he nearly passed out.
Things turned sh—- very fast. His wife took out a temporary restraining order, accusing him of attempting to kidnap their youngest son. The claim was never proved in court. Then, with the aid of some high-priced lawyers, she extracted from him a whopping $50,000 a month — a full 75 percent of his monthly income. Barred from the house, he was not allowed regular access to the office he used to generate that income. (On the few times he was permitted inside, his wife did not let him use the bathroom. She insisted that he go outside in the woods.)
Paul is a very wealthy man, an “alpha” by most men’s definitions (though not by my definition) — he earns over $65,000 per month — yet his high financial status ultimately did not shield him from his wife’s dr. jekyll mrs. hyde act. In fact, it may have hastened her merciless decision. Paul is a classic beta provider, and after his wife had extracted the last penny of tribute from him to raise the kids to a self-sufficient age and live the life of a bon bon eating oprah watcher, she disposed of him with the cold-hearted cruelty of a despot dispatching his enemies by firing squad. His wife is likely a Hillary supporter.
Maxim #13: When the love is gone, women can be as cold as if they had never known you.
If that isn’t enough to convince you of the high risk gamble that is marriage, here’s another horror story:
Long before his wife came along, a frame-store owner named Jordan Appel, 55, had built a fine house for himself atop West Newton Hill in one of the fancier Boston suburbs. He loved bringing in a wife and then adding two children. “It felt so wonderful to say ‘my wife’ and ‘my children’ and feel part of a community.” He volunteered for the preschool’s yard sale; his wife took up with a lover. Sometimes she slept with him in Appel’s own house; in time, she decided to divorce Appel. As these things go, he was obliged to leave the house, and, as it happened, the community too. Money was so tight that he ended up sleeping in a storage room above his frame shop two towns away. His ex-wife works part-time on the strength of Appel’s child custody and alimony payments, and spends time with her boyfriend in Appel’s former house. She lives rather well, and he has to make $100,000 a year to support her and the children, which amounts to 70-hour workweeks. One day, he went back to his house and discovered many of his belongings out on the sidewalk with the trash. “My body feels like it’s dissolving in anger,” he says. “I’m in an absolute rage every single day.”
Now of course, many of you will say “but this guy Jordan is a total beta letting his wife take advantage of him like that!” and you’d be right. But regardless of his personal failings, his congenital betatude is no reason to accede to injustice codified by a discriminatory legal system. Either the laws change (and I personally favor elimination of no fault divorce as a start) or men should heed my advice and stay clear of the altar. Since I am not going to lift a finger to agitate for new laws that have a zero percent chance of happening in my lifetime, I follow the second option.
Maxim #8: Marriage is a social mechanism designed to exchange sex for indentured servitude.
So why are women now the eager instigators of divorce? What changed in the culture? Four things, primarily: the pill, easy divorce, women’s economic independence, and rigged laws that make divorce a good financial prospect for women. The four sirens of the sexual apocalypse together have created the perfect sociological storm where a woman has every incentive in the world to ditch a husband to follow the whims of her heart once his usefulness has been exhausted.
Listen to me — skip all that shit and learn to get the sex for free if you don’t already. All the positive loving benefits you can get out of marriage can also be had within an unmarried relationship.
Later in the article, the question is asked what can men do to avoid divorce?
One way, of course, is to avoid marriage.
The CH method. So elegant, so simple. So effective!
[…]husbands might be wise to pay attention to the essential ratio that — according to John Gottman, PhD, a world-renowned researcher of marriage stability — governs marital success or failure: five to one. That means husbands (and wives) should direct at least five positive remarks or actions to their spouses for every negative one. Any less and the marriage is in trouble.
Dr. John Gottman, five to one you are a dumbfuck. Glorifying their wives and putting them on pedestals is exactly what cost these hopeless betas their marriages. What they need to do is challenge their wives, not kiss their expanding asses with a stream of compliments. Cockiness, humor, turning the tables, not taking her shit, flirting with other women while wifey is watching… these are the improvements in character that will keep a wife’s love for her husband strong. As long as men are following the advice of these “social scientists” they will never unlock the mystery of what attracts women to men and they will suffer the consequences.
Here is an excellent quote from the article which vividly illustrates how badly the system is rigged in favor of women:
“A father could be sitting in his own home, not agreeing to a divorce, not unfaithful to his marriage vows, and not abusive, and the next thing he knows, the court has taken his house, his children, and a lot of his money, and then forced him to pay his wife’s legal fees and even her psychologist’s fees. And he can be threatened with jail time if he resists.”
To recap:
divorce theft
monogamy
second class spouse under the law
sex once a month TOPS with the same old poon
So.
Where’s the upside?
See how the ”redpill” churchian church misrepresented and lied about ”married game” for some 10 years, just as Pseudonymous Commenter said?
& why now only the most churchian ”redpill” ”leaders” like JackGOPLGBTQ+ discuss game or ”rizz” to look ”cool” in front of dakidz & backwards baseball cap wearing ”cool” ”redpill” soccerdads?