Larry Sanger
Wikipedia Co-Founder Larry Sanger Reveals How Anonymous For-Hire Editors Shape the Narrative on the Platform
“They can libel people with impunity … and there is no legal recourse”
Did you know that 85% of the most influential accounts on Wikipedia—the “Power 62”—are anonymous? We simply don’t know who they are. It’s a fact.
I did my homework. Read more here.
The rest of the Nine Theses:
The same problem with anonymity applies elsewhere on the internet. Anonymity is a cancer that removes personal accountability and self-restraint.
I recall, a long time ago Southern historian, C Van Woodward making a comment about Wikipedia offhand in an interview with Johnson White House historian, Thoams Carro in reference to Wikipedia
“citation without sources, without names, without accurate dates and the publications will rewrite history.”
Carro added “History is not pretty, much of it can be embarrassing even in objectivity, historians will lose their credibility if this trend continues. In my classes I have taught, my students get angry with me when I remark on their papers that ‘wikipedia is not a citable source’ ”
Now with the future, with AI its going to get much, much worse
I’ve long since told my children that, and they know what my role there was.
When I worked on Wikipedia, I was young and naive. Now I’m fairly horrified by it and the part I played. That makes this ironic:
Derek this comment is exemplary of what I’m referring to
Of all the paragraphs of my comment to zero in on you missed the one that would make you come across as an empathic Christian brother and human being
A huge chunk of my ability to provide for my family was sacrificed on the altar of truth that we have burning here.
What the hell is wrong with you?
I’ve had to abandon the nation of my birth. The only place I’ve ever called home for the entire 52 years of my life to scrape after money in another country. A form of financial exile so I can feed my children. I only hope my cancelers don’t find where I’ve run to. And I still post here to help the men make sense of this.
What are you concerned about? What your legacy on Wikipedia means.
Here is what I had said: “Arguably, my most impactful contribution to humanity is my work on Wikipedia.” He never understood why I always bring this up, and it isn’t to pat myself on the back. It’s simply a fact that I have had an impact and a legacy, but much of it brings regret. At the very least it is a mixed bag, some good, some bad. In fact, my comment, in context, was self-deprecating.
The point is, Wikipedia has fallen low and I regret my small role in it. I don’t like the idea that my most impactful contribution to mankind was a negative contribution.
Correct.
I make few predictions, but one thing is clear. AI will create a monoculture of thought. With the so many (already) farming out their thinking to AI, the lack of diverse thought in AI will lead everyone to a kind of mass conformity. If you think group-think is bad now, it’s only going to get much, much worse.
They won’t even need to censor anyone, people will do it to themselves, just as they have been through their anonymity.
In the future, the most important political opinions will become like blankslatism. They will be beliefs that everyone collectively asserts, even if deep down they don’t actually believe what they are saying. Why? Because AI told them it was true.
The internet was supposed to facilitate a diversity of thought, and for a while I suppose it did. But it’s going to be used to facilitate widespread conformity of thought. I don’t envy our lonely commenter friend who will never attend a church again. We’re really going to rely on family and community in the next few decades.
Pseudonymous Commenter bringing it(as if it was 1995)!!!
Pseudonymous Commenter says:
30 September, 2025 at 2:16 pm
Having them stand there and not get any attention from the gals makes the women look bad & g@y.
No. It makes the men look bad. Everything at modernist churches makes men look bad. You’re there? Bad. Not there? Bad. Showing interest in women’s gins & butts there? Bad. Not showing interest? Bad. You care ’bout ginas & butts? Bad. You don’t care? Bad. Nothing a man can do at a modernist church is “good” except Sunday morning nightclubbing in ST.DAL’S honour ladz.
Most everybody sees that these fellas should be good enough, but no say the women.
No. No one sees or notices young single men at church other than keeping them in line and making sure they are reading their bibles and not watching porn.
Deep down in their hearts, the gals know better, and are constantly reminded of this by the fella’s presence.
No. The gals don’t know anything about anything – themselves, these men, or anything else. All they know is how they look to Chad.
So the fellas should be gone, so they don’t look like heels for rejecting him. This is all about preserving virtue.
No, the fellas should be gone only if they are not “humbly butt serving” as “ gina servant followers” and are not self flagellating for having “impure thoughts” about Susie’s uncovered lewd butt in the next pew.
Sorry, FB, you’re off on this one with no cigar for Monic orrifice. St.Dalrock(ROISSYS’ best distorting reality churchian disciple) dealt with this perfectly in his house that ROISSY & GBFM built & maintained as they did the entire ”manosphere”.
Can Derek and well-known in the golden age ”manosphere” soccerdad Paul Elam please cut back on mutual submission talk, as it’s driving Pseudonymous Commenter mad?
Farm Boy says:
29 September, 2025 at 5:01 pm
Somewhat on-topic
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAt9pbnRK-4
Tell a Woman a mutual neutral NO in mutual submission and watch HER mutual submission REACTION ladz
Pseudonymous Commenter says:
29 September, 2025 at 5:36 pm
RE the ”redpill” soccerdad Paul Elam video:
That’s the “mutual submission” preached at other nameless places. He’s supposed to mutually neutrally “submit” to her as much as she mutually neutrally“submits” to him.
Even the very structure of this comment implies a misunderstanding of the concept. Mutual submission is not “I submit to you as much as you submit to me” it is “submit to each other as to Christ.” Can you see the difference?
Obviously this is just a political agenda. The CEO of Wikipedia could take away the ability to be an editor on wikipedia without proving your identity without having to make a law that takes away anonimity everywhere online. The Jew wants to take away anonimity so they can keep pushing genocide against Whites and nobody can call them out. Simple as. Calvinists also love the idea of taking away anonimity so they can send goons to your house to harass you if you argue against the doctrines of disgrace. If anonimity is removed then we become a Calvinist dictatorship that simultaneously aids the Jews in wiping out Whites….or everyone abandons the internet and we end up back in the 80s….only time can tell which.
Regardless, the bad fruit of anonymity is easily demonstrated all by itself. Now, to be clear, Christians should take away their own anonymity in obedience to God. Political policy and force do not replace true choice and personal repentance.
That is how I differ from what you describe above. This is why I don’t dox anyone. They should be revealing themselves all on their own. It is not my task to reveal them and doing so would not result in their having a change of heart.
No. Hebrews is anonymous. Various Bible characters are anonymous that Jesus healed etc. You’ve bought into the Calvinist brainwashing. God himself is anonymous in some theophanies even. And men entertained angels unawares because the angels were logged in to anonymous flesh accounts pretending to be humans.
surfdumb says:
30 September, 2025 at 4:24 pm
Eyesore- the picture of the generals sitting in the g@y Hegseth meeting.
Those are the sword holders of the government so I need to be GOPLGBTQ+ respectful of them. I wish they didn’t create such a gay and cowardly impression. If those are our battle leaders, then we can only win via prayer and fasting.
Liked by 1 person
Pseudonymous Commenter says:
30 September, 2025 at 5:03 pm
Fee, CP
Those Boomer and GenX church ladies all have “ministries” now. They all either lead bible studies or have “dance ministries”. They all want to be Joyce Meyer or TrumpGOPLGBTQ+supporter Paula White or Lysa Terkeurst or whoever else the heretic flavor of the month is.
Like
Farm Boy says:
30 September, 2025 at 5:17 pm
One might hope that older ladies learned from their mistakes…
But we might all be Cautiously Pessimistic=”patriarchal” blackpillers today.
Also all the ”redpill” soccerdads think i don’t know they got a g@y age restriction on a certain video from 2013/14?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCOQNMSwDO4
O.C.R. “ONE COC- RULE” BETAS BUTTHEXTING EMPOWERED LYRICS BY da GBFM
29,872 views Aug 21, 2013
GBFM lyrics. da GBFM writes “THEY VIOLATE THE ONE (PENIS) RULE THEY ARE OUT! OUT!
OUT!
O U T OUT! lzozlzlzl”
Source of lyrics, the Genius da GBFM: http://greatbooksformen.wordpress.com
zloozozozozozozoz
da GBFM at your serviceesz lzozozozo!!
“I’ve been seeing this girl for a year. We live together and I’ve still got hand.”
OMG lzozzlzll wtf are fuckity fucks doing with chix in your homes? lzozlzlzlz omg lozlzlzlzlzl looozers lzozlzlzlz1!! hzhzh
THEY VIOLATE THE ONE COCK RULE THEY ARE OUT! OUT!
OUT!
O U T OUT! lzozlzlzl
OMG lozlzlzozlozozolzl wft r u doing dating a chick 4 a yer did your dick fall off? Were yu chosen by her ankle and given an award and medal to support today’s puppies putt putting, the vampiressses cuckholders cockcutters?
sounds 2 me it is the latter as u have no cock lzozlzlzlzl lzzozl
and she made you think of another cock
fucktard haven’t u heard of the one cock rule?
let’s teach these douches somethin ’bout nbein a man yo!
throw a beat over this way. yo yo yo yo yo yo yo
now hit it!
one cock rule one cock rule i ain’t no beta fool i ain’t no beta tool about another cock ya make me think i’m gone, gone to the beach, let the betas buy yas yer next drink
one cock rule one cock rule i ain’t no beats fool i ain’t no beta tool over vampires and werewolfe you ginas all drool letting their cocks touch your deep down stool then you blame the betas in school and transfer wealth for SOURCE OF HER ANKLE gene pool MOMMA goldberg’S sends our alphas 2 die on foreign shores stuffing his face with dc pizza as they die in fiat wars neocon womenz repeating butthexers lies in their mags even after menopause and no need for da ragz telling young chickas to lust after vampires as they build their fiat empires
one cock rule one cock rule i ain’t no fool i ain’t no tool about another cock ya make me think i’m gone, to the beach, let the betas buy yas yer next drink
let the betas pay to raise your bastard kids let the betas sign teh fiat masters marriage contracts theft in fiat inflation is hid as they swing their bankrupting axe i don’t care what last night u did, ever since i kicked ya gina out, i been relaxed.
as they promote butthex across the land ripping out fetuses from parenthood planned as fathers form teh homes the neocons ban the atalnatic authoresses just don’t undertsand
but when chix wakes up and her butt is sore it’s not my fault no–it’s cause she’s a bore
as the fiat masters desoul women with butthex cock teach them to transfer wealth with pre-teen strumpet rock
one cock rule one cock rule i ain’t no fool i ain’t no tool about another cock ya make me think i’m gone, gone to the beach, let the betas buy yas yer next drink
womenz womenz HER ANKLE took advanatge of you you wasted your best years on vampires and werewolves and now you cry your tears cause of your sore anus stamp your little feet saying, “you betas must pay for this!!!”
and aging neocon women promoting butthexing vampires teacxhing women to lust after the undead as the neocons suck the western world dry bankrupting it all,m enlsaving it debt while selfish womenz at the atalnatic monthly cry cry cry cry cry cry not for you or me but for themselves not for the but for their dried up ginas and sore assholes so many chances they had to marry a nice guy but he left her dry so whe butthexed with the asshole and now see her cry and wonder why and transofrm the entire univeristy into a program to further the fiat lie to transfer wealth and wage war and death to about fifty million more and redefine fifty cocks in her ass as empowered and not a bore
all together now!
lzozllzzl lozlzlz zlozozoz lozlzl lzozozlz ozlzooz zlo9oo lozlzlz ozlzoozl ozlzlzoz lzozlz zlzoz zlzozzlozlzozlo
one cock rule one cock rule i ain’t no fool i ain’t no tool
about another cock ya make me think i’m gone, gone to the beach, let the betas buy yas yer next drink alreayd seen yer pink stink bent ya over the sink
and howscomes the bankers southpark never does satarize because everything is fair game–truth love honor–excpet for fiat butthexing lies.
all together now!
lzozllzzl lozlzlz zlozozoz lozlzl lzozozlz ozlzooz zlo9oo lozlzlz ozlzoozl ozlzlzoz lzozlz zlzoz zlzozzlozlzozlo
AND THREE COCK RULE:
to the 24 for or so tardbetadouches who voted my “one cock rule” rap down
lozlzlzlzlozzllzlzlzlz
what do ya want?
a two cock rule rap?
or three cock rule?
three cock rule, three cock rule, i’m a beta herb my own cock won’t do i need a chick to cuckold me i ”
”redpillers” can’t handle reality=”redpill” & they have proven it by getting their fellow glowies in the C.I.A.=google to age restrict that video!
Oh yeah, i forgot to mention about 5 days back, Surfdumb admitted that Kirk wasn’t ”rp” as he does here also.
surfdumb’s avatarsurfdumb says:
30 September, 2025 at 6:12 pm
From Hillary, “The idea of we the people, that all men and women are created equal, that seems to be in the crosshairs of those on the right who want to turn the clock back on the progress that has been made, writing out huge chunks of our history, slavery, suffrage, anything inconvenient, you know, take it out of museums, take it out of national parks.”
Seems like RP is even reaching old evilz Hillary.
I keep saying it, Charlie Kirk’s primary sin is saying women should get married young and be at home. Somehow, even though not an RP guy, that part of his talks is piercing all of the Orcs. Don’t know why him with feminism not a focus of his at all has been so effective on this point.
Also
I don’t envy our lonely commenter friend who will never attend a church again. We’re really going to rely on family and community in the next few decades.
YEAH, but at one time Savage was ”a Party of One, heretic of heretics” yet by around the time of this article, the HBD & GAME ROISSYosphere was in full force!
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2009/08/03/party-of-one-2
Party of One
By Kelefa Sanneh
July 27, 2009
As a radio host Michael Savage is a heretic among heretics as contemptuous of fellow rightwing stars as he is of liberal…
As a radio host, Michael Savage is a heretic among heretics, as contemptuous of fellow right-wing stars as he is of liberal politics.Illustration by Philip Burke
On January 20th, at around 12:04 P.M., the nation’s conservative talk-show hosts once again became the voice of the resistance. Many of them had spent eight years grappling with the vexing Presidency of George W. Bush, so when Barack Obama was sworn in they suddenly found themselves freed from the inhibiting effects of ambivalence. A liberal new President had joined the familiar array of villains in the House and the Senate, and although none of the big-name talk-show hosts celebrated this development, all of them seemed energized by it. Sean Hannity, who had generally been supportive of Bush, coined a spiffy new slogan to reflect the changed political climate: “The Conservative Underground, the Home of Conservatism in Exile.” Rush Limbaugh, who sometimes criticized Bush during his second term, quickly realized that the defeat of the Republican Party would only enhance his stature as a rousing speechmaker, unconstrained by electoral politics. (After Limbaugh said, of President Obama, “I hope he fails,” the Obama Administration and its allies found it useful to declare Limbaugh the unofficial leader of the Republican Party; in May, Limbaugh announced his resignation with mock solemnity, saying, “I was appointed without my acquiescence.”) And on January 19th, the day before the Inauguration, the radio and television host Glenn Beck launched a nightly show on Fox News, deftly channelling the defiance and bewilderment of dissident America.
Even in this world of born-again refuseniks, Michael Savage is an anomaly: a heretic among heretics, nearly as contemptuous of his fellow radio stars (he refers to Limbaugh as “the golfer,” and calls Beck “the hemorrhoid with eyes”) as he is of President Obama. He calls himself a “gen-yoo-wine independent conservative,” which is a kind of sales pitch—and, apparently, an effective one. His daily broadcast, “The Savage Nation,” is one of the most popular talk shows in the country. The magazine Talkers ranks Savage third on its “Heavy Hundred” list, behind only Limbaugh and Hannity, and estimates that he reaches more than eight million listeners weekly.
What he gives those listeners is one of the most addictive programs on radio, and one of the least predictable. San Francisco is his adopted home town (he calls it “San Fransicko,” a nickname that may or may not be affectionate, depending on the context and his mood), but he delivers his analysis and his anecdotes in a vinegary New York accent, occasionally
seasoned with Yiddish, and this voice alone conveys something of the nostalgia he feels for his boyhood in the Bronx and Queens, in the forties and fifties. He is quick to anger, and often provides evidence of his firm belief that political understatement is overrated, as when he mentioned, in passing, that President Obama was “dragging us by the neck into the neo-Marxist nation of the new Venezuela.” He yields to no one in his disdain for liberals (he once wrote a book called “Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder”), not to mention illegal immigrants, fraudulent food-stamp recipients, Judge Sotomayor (“a stone-hearted racist and a narcissist”), gay-rights activists, the Congressional Black Caucus, and, for that matter, our national pastime. (“I still can’t believe that in this day and age an adult would go to a baseball game,” he says, adding, suggestively, that baseball is very popular in Communist Cuba.)
&
The Jew wants to take away anonimity so they can keep pushing genocide against Whites and nobody can call them out.
ONE ethnic JEW did:https://www.splcenter.org/resources/hatewatch/michael-savage-promotes-white-nationalist-conspiracy-his-radio-show-wins-praise-racist/
In a world where whites face an imminent threat of extinction from a nefarious global cabal, white supremacist and antisemite Sacco Vandal pondered, “Can there be such a thing as /Our Jew/?”
If so, he claimed, it would be nationally syndicated conservative radio host Michael Savage.
Savage, a pundit known for his extreme rhetoric, won this praise by devoting significant airtime in the past week to what he called, “cultural genocide being promulgated against Caucasians” — the racist conspiracy theory otherwise known as “white genocide.” On Monday, Savage spent his entire show on the topic, as he railed against a comment from U.S. House of Representatives Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi criticizing President Donald Trump’s immigration plan, which she said was an attempt to “Make America White Again.”
“Do you have any idea how sick and vile this racist statement is?” Savage asked his viewers. He went on, “She’s basically unhitched herself from her own people, her own culture, her own heritage in order to appease the masses who keep her in power.”
The conspiracy of white genocide contends that there is a deliberate scheme underway to exterminate white people, or white culture, by overwhelming Western populations with non-whites. White supremacists typically accuse Jewish people of engineering this plot. Savage, who is Jewish, blamed Democrats.
“Unless we stand up to the racists and the genocidal maniacs who are attacking, attacking, attacking,” Savage said, “there will be nothing left to protect, there will be nothing left to save. Everything of our culture will be gone.”
The irony of a self-described “student of the Holocaust” deploying a traditionally antisemitic talking point may have been lost on Savage, but it wasn’t lost on Vandal, a racist ex-Marine who, along with his twin brother Vanzetti Vandal, runs a blog advocating that whites return to the “barbarity” of their past and “rape, pillage and plunder” like their ancestors.
“Right now, the most outspoken and ardent opponents of White Genocide…generally reserve their most scathing ire for the people-race-nation-church seemingly most responsible for perpetuating White Genocide: Jews,” Vandal wrote on his blog, VandalVoid. “But here we have Michael Savage, a Jew, leading the charge against these anti-Whites—the sole national figure, with the exception of maybe Alex Jones (albeit Savage goes even further than Jones), to do so.”
Vandal is perhaps best known for originating the misogynist meme “white sharia,” proponents of which argue that white women should be subjected to the same kind of brutality perpetrated by the Taliban.
“The Muslim world is the only civilization left on Earth today where an extreme and rigidly codified patriarchy still exists,” Vandal wrote. “Sharia law, though practiced today by some of the world’s most despicable races, is the only living example of anything that even remotely approximates the patriarchal society that Western man once had himself.”
This is not the first time Savage has discussed white genocide on his show. He talked about it multiple times when President Barack Obama was in office. In those days, he said Obama was behind it. Once, he even attributed his claim to a Mayan prophecy.
Savage is no stranger to bigoted rhetoric. In 2003, he lost his job at MSNBC after only a few months when he told a prank caller, “Oh, so you’re one of those sodomites. You should only get AIDS and die, you pig; how’s that?” In 2014, he targeted U.S. veterans with PTSD, saying they were giving into “weakness” and being allowed “to cry like a little baby in bed.”
He reaches as many as 10 million listeners through his radio show, nationally syndicated by Cumulus Media, Inc.
Already with AI. For exmaple, an English V-blogger…it might have been Paul J Watson told AI to create a picture of an “average” English family in the mid 18th Century
It generated a picture of a black couple in period dress
It was reported or mentioned to the AI copmany. They did a “kinda-sorta” apology and mentioned “they are still working on it” statemnts.
No. This was intentional. History on so many levels is going to be “rewritten”
While in England in 2019, I wanted to see an actual Shakespearean play performed at a theater, or by a compnay.
Well, While planning that trip I found PLENTY in London and Manchester.
I got excited. “Which play is going on? / Which theaters(s) / how exciting!”
Well, when I checked each company and theater
EVery play was “based” on a Shakepeare play. No period dress. Modern language and sorry, “Hamlet” was a Dane. Not a black man from Nigeria. “Taming of the Shrew” took place in Italy, not modern London with a bisexual “shrew” who just happens to be black.
I could not find ONE company or production house or theater during my stay in 2019 (over a month) that put on a traditional “Shakespearean” play.
Mind you, what Shakespeare did for the English Language has not since been repeated (Like Cervantes for Spanish)
Sooner than later at this point, the word “Shakespeare” will be dropped completely and these “new” adaptations will be the standard…and already he is being branded a “racist” in some circles.
Even in US high schools today. There isnt one Shakespeare play read in many cases in Caliofrnia.
The same problem with anonymity applies elsewhere on the internet. Anonymity is a cancer that removes personal accountability and self-restraint.
&
While in England in 2019, I wanted to see an actual Shakespearean play performed at a theater, or by a compnay.
Well, While planning that trip I found PLENTY in London and Manchester.
I got excited. “Which play is going on? / Which theaters(s) / how exciting!”
Well, when I checked each company and theater
EVery play was “based” on a Shakepeare play. No period dress. Modern language and sorry, “Hamlet” was a Dane. Not a black man from Nigeria. “Taming of the Shrew” took place in Italy, not modern London with a bisexual “shrew” who just happens to be black.
I could not find ONE company or production house or theater during my stay in 2019 (over a month) that put on a traditional “Shakespearean” play.
Mind you, what Shakespeare did for the English Language has not since been repeated (Like Cervantes for Spanish)
Sooner than later at this point, the word “Shakespeare” will be dropped completely and these “new” adaptations will be the standard…and already he is being branded a “racist” in some circles.
Even in US high schools today. There isnt one Shakespeare play read in many cases in Caliofrnia.
YEAH!The next time some glowie ”redpill” SJW comes here?i’ll be taking a literal page out of VOX DAY’S BOOK ( ”pill” SJWs Always Lie: Taking Down the ”pill” Thought Police)with Cookbook Gal(from Amazon) here.
” Cookbook Gal
5.0 out of 5 stars A paradigm shift
Reviewed in the United States on October 3, 2015
Verified Purchase
If you’ve been wondering what in blazes is going on, why your words are twisted, your intent questioned, and your morality maligned over the most inane topics, this may be the answer. It has been for me. I had heard of Day and GamerGate once or twice before I read this book. I’d never heard of Sad Puppies, John Scalzi or Milo Yiannopoulos.
Imagine a conversation, ostensibly among friends or colleagues, in which social safety nets are being discussed. You innocently state an INCONTROVERTIBLE FACT, backed by years of studies, such as “graduating from high school and getting married BEFORE having children, greatly reduces the likelihood of a woman living in poverty.” You made no statement about the merits of the social programs at all. The response? “You hate women.” “Do you want children to go hungry?”
WHAT? Perhaps there was a communication failure on your part, so you repeat yourself, clarifying what you meant. Oddly, logic has no effect whatsoever. Your audience not only brushes your citations aside, they misconstrue them and then they double down and accuse you of having said something you never said. You suspect you may have entered the Twilight Zone, or someone slipped something into your iced tea. You keep trying. Eventually, after YEARS of incidents like this in your personal and professional life, you decide to just shut up, and practice self-censorship.
In this book, Day explains what is going on, and it was a life-changing revelation for me. SJWs believe that their positions are morally superior and, therefore, by extension THEY are morally superior people. Any disagreement (or lack of enthusiastic endorsement) with The Narrative is proof that the other person is a moral inferior against whom any attack is acceptable: contacting employers to get the person fired, harassing family members, accusing a man in a mixed-race 20 year marriage of being a racist, etc. In order to protect The Narrative, SJWs behavior is defined by three rules: they always lie, they always double down, and they always project. As someone who tends to favor dialectic over rhetoric, I can see how I have failed to communicate effectively with people whose self righteous babbling is, basically, emotional self indulgence – something they do to make themselves feel better. My entire mindset has shifted because I now realize that people like this are not arguing in good faith.
The Scalzi, Gamergate, and Science Fiction Writers incidents are covered clearly and concisely. Two of Day’s strengths as a writer are his pithiness and his ability to organize the book in a logical manner that flows. He provides examples, and explains what people did right and wrong in response to attacks. Given the book’s subject matter and layout, I see a market for future editions that expand on his thesis and provide additional examples of failures and successes. I would like to see more examples of the use of pseudo-dialectic, because I’m not really clear on that. There are some editing glitches, such as quotation marks being placed inside periods instead of outside, and a repeated word or two, but nothing major.
I don’t use Twitter, but I checked out Day’s and Yiannopoulos’s Twitter feeds, and they’re hilarious. So, if someone accuses me of a “microaggression,” I’m going to look them in the eye and say, “Also, you’re fat. Sorry, no offense, but it’s true.”
Good book, quick read, highly recommend.”
Anonymity is a cancer that removes personal accountability and self-restraint.
Yeah hence why ”goody two shoe” ”RPGenius” ”leaders” relive Junior high/middle school & high school as ”enlightened” frat boys after they think ”If I act like a ”holy” ahole i’ll be popular with MEN,boys & women alike.”They don’t understand that the popular ”redpill” PUAS weren’t guys like themselves who pretended to be MR. Rogers & pastor Billy Graham at their churchian church & then got ”redpill rage” over all the @nal s*x & sodomy oral s*x they missed out on & then pretended to be ”holy” aholes like themselves in the watered-down churchian church of Rome-type heretical ROISSYosphere or ”manosphere” as the heretical ”redpillers” call it.
There also is a high level of humility, honesty, intelligence, and wisdom, required to properly diagnose your own faults and errors after ”redpill rage”, before they become more obvious in ”redpill ” hindsight. And not many people have enough of all those traits to avoid just engaging in counterproductive self-justification or excessive self-doubt whichever they are most prone to. And some poor folks probably even manage to do both, being plagued by bluepill insecurities and then soothing themselves with poorly thought out knee-jerk self-affirmations of all women are unregenerate defilers & scum.
”redpillers”(especially ”RPGenius’ ”leaders”)are generally more interested in learning outward-looking popular ahole psychology so they can use it to label anybody who disagrees with them with some type of Satanic Simp Frame goddess worshipping feminism that they themselves practise.
Off topic: which is similar to a certain guy I know who likes to throw around the names of various anti-ST.DALrockian false teachings claiming that everybody who disagrees with him can’t even think straight and is guilty of being a Satanic Simp Frame goddess worshipper like himself. Yet he is too prone to excitedly throw about the names of supposed anti- & pro-ST.DALrockian false teachings that he has only just heard of(as everything he reads in the watered-down churchian ROISSYosphere has to be about how evil his ex-wife is/was) and still doesn’t properly comprehend, as he is a foolish, proud, self-righteous ”redpill” checkerpantsGOPLGBTQ+supporter. There seemingly is a desire there to forcibly label the other person’s logic as somehow Satanic bluepill, feminist, & goddess-worshippy and thereby dismiss the other person’s claims to avoid mentally grappling with the substance of their claims of ”innocence” & ”righteousness.”
I reckon that contrary claims and evidence of ”mutual submission”are far harder for a dichotomous black & white ”redpill” thinker to contemplate, than for typical people who can easily shift their opinion to any place along a broad spectrum of proud self-righteous ”redpill” checkerpantsGOPLGBTQ+supporter, rather than being mentally constrained to one or the other extreme end point. The binary thinker has to disqualify and reject his opponent’s evidence of ”mutual submission” in its entirety, in his own mind, in order to keep that contrary evidence from exposing that his habitually forcing each concept to its most extreme endpoint often leaves him in the indefensible position where to even properly respond to any evidence directing him away from his all-or-nothing of proud self-righteous ”redpill” checkerpantsGOPLGBTQ+supporter position, he’d have to either completely flip to believing the opposite extreme or else give up his absolutist contention that there can’t even be any rational positions between those two absolute extremes.
Anyhow, that’s my pop ”manosphere” AKA in-TRUTH the watered down churchian church of Rome-type heretical ROISSYosphere that the proud self-righteous ”redpill” checkerpantsGOPLGBTQ+supporter destroyed -psychological analysis.