Looks like there is a new policy. Would have been nice if that had been the policy when I was there, eh?
In other news, I’ve run out of posts (for now) and will be posting less frequently until I catch up.
Looks like there is a new policy. Would have been nice if that had been the policy when I was there, eh?
In other news, I’ve run out of posts (for now) and will be posting less frequently until I catch up.
Jack is mainly doing that because of guys like JOHN THE FOOL and TOMB REFUGEE/CATACOMB RESIDENT sounding like what they used to call obvious lying commenters(What they and DAL thought Derek was when he first showed up) who like their wives and call them treasures but now ”it’s possible & TRUE & fully redpilled”.
WHY?
Not only because Jack’s new friends preach it but because of the tradwife trend & guys like a certain genius and Saint went overboard on the ”women are evil” image of the blackpill (which comes from those same types of commenters not usually the guys who have sworn off women and actually like their female-less life now bandwagon.
That i think this is why the ”saint”(jack told him either tone it down or leave & he left instead of get the muzzle like the ”genius” likes) is no longer there as he’s the main one that blackpills it up there as the” genius” has already been warned multiple times to tone down his own blackpillness or get moderated into oblivion.
What type of women/wives are positive comment that Jack wants now?:
Tomb Refugee says:
2024-09-11 at 4:36 am
My beloved is a treasure; she has never been a part of any female herd. She always solicits my input on her clothing, etc. and does what I suggest. I am most fortunate.
That got four likes nowadays at jacks ”positivity ” Pastor Robert Hour of Power Schuller type red pill” site and not even one ”you’re a lying troll, yet simping c@ntworshipper also dude” response.
See if that would have happened even just a year ago when Derek was still there.
Oh, my. I do not understand why these men enjoy having servile, subservient wives. A woman who always solicits his input on her clothing choices? Wow.
I’d call this childish, except once they reach a certain age children mostly stop asking their parent—usually the mom—what they should wear. Such dependency is infantile. Per our recent discussion, I’d predict that Catacomb Resident is an INTx who prefers the extra-mothering type (or, alternatively, is himself a mothering type).
IMO, a man shouldn’t be dressing his wife every day, just as he shouldn’t be dressing his children every day. It seems far more natural for the man to occasionally ask his wife what he should wear, just as children typically only ever ask the mom what to wear. But, certain personalities appear to treasure when the wife always asks her husband what to wear.
It’s a bit unusual and non-standard, but unlike the judgmental patriarchal types, I think that a husband and wife can do whatever they want, whether or not it is my preference.
—————————————
Recently at home we’ve been discussing the agency of women. We talk about how society holds women to a lesser standard (e.g. punishments for crime; family court and child support). In short, society does one of two things:
(1) It implicitly views women as having lesser agency than men. Claims to the contrary are just polite lies, due to the obvious and undeniable double-standard.
(2) It implicitly views women as being inherently superior to men—women deserve greater privilege—because all persons have equal agency.
You (apparently) have to pick one or the other.
If society wanted to view men and women as being both truly equal and having truly identical agency, then they’d have to behave differently and structure society differently.
So what does this have to do with Catacomb Resident? He clearly views his wife as having lesser agency than himself (option #1) while rejecting feminism (option #2). She’s expected to obey him, because he is naturally superior to her. He seems to premise her being his treasure on her subservience.
I think the difference here is that I view my wife as having equal agency and equal to me in worth. I don’t view her or myself as inherently superior to the other on account of being male or female. While I appreciate when she solicits my opinion, I don’t need her to be subservient to my every whim. I appreciate a woman who can think for herself, someone who isn’t a drone.
Catacomb Resident feels differently, thus the reason he isn’t criticized.
”Oh, my. I do not understand why these men enjoy having servile, subservient wives. A woman who always solicits his input on her clothing choices? Wow.”
i think you know what i and MOD would say: something about Narcissism?
i don’t even like thinking(as I’m too busy like a ”genius” claims to be) about what clothes i need to wear the next day, let alone thinking of somebody else’s clothes.
But these busybody effeminates like all busybodies think it’s some mark of excellence on their part instead of a failure of (most likely) parenting of the woman by her parents.
I’d call this childish, except once they reach a certain age children mostly stop asking their parent—usually the mom—what they should wear. Such dependency is infantile. Per our recent discussion, I’d predict that Catacomb Resident is an INTx who prefers the extra-mothering type (or, alternatively, is himself a mothering type).
IMO, a man shouldn’t be dressing his wife every day, just as he shouldn’t be dressing his children every day. It seems far more natural for the man to occasionally ask his wife what he should wear, just as children typically only ever ask the mom what to wear. But, certain personalities appear to treasure when the wife always asks her husband what to wear.
It’s a bit unusual and non-standard, but unlike the judgmental patriarchal types, I think that a husband and wife can do whatever they want, whether or not it is my preference.
The busybodies call it ”Patriarchical” while their Ds and Rs heroes/idols/”allies” (in their fantasies NOT reality), as well as DR.Feellings friends, call it Narcissism like i and MOD usually do too.
That’s because you’re a normal man, and probably not a 2% INTJ.
Fashion is the domain of women. A woman’s fashion is largely a matter of social signaling to other women. Even when a woman is signaling to men through provocative dress, she’s doing so in competition with other women. A woman who is alone (i.e. persistently without a female audience) doesn’t ever have to dress like a whore around men.
The public icons of the fashion industry are mostly women and gay men. Just turn on a TV.
I’ve no doubt there are (straight) businessmen operating behind the scenes, but those are the ones concerned with fashion-as-money, not fashion-as-fashion.
We once called fashion-conscious straight men “metrosexuals.”
Regardless of what the failure is (e.g. her parents), she’s married a husband who engages in traditional effeminate behaviors that are the normal domain of women.
I’ve yet to read any Red Pillers explain why non-Red Pilled women think the manosphere is “creepy” and “gay,” because that’s how they perceive it. When I see Red Pilled men promote traditionally feminine behaviors, I understand the thought behind that perception.
Now, if Catacomb Resident doesn’t let his wife outside the home, then perhaps he’s just talking about telling her how she should dress for him at home, which is frankly too much information.
Perhaps it is narcissism, but it seems more like a fringe fetish (of the 2%) to me. Except, if you don’t agree with their fetish choices, you are in violation of God’s commandments. So, maybe narcissism is correct.
Over the tears comments like “and you have to check / verify make sure she is raising the children right daily”
So that is another task Red Pill men have to do. “Oh her place is in the home” and you as a man still have to go over every little thing she does
and fix your classic car, be involved in “Leadership” in the church, have time to go to the gym a few hours a day, of course work a full time job with “good” provision….anything other than a STEM degree or a career in STEM is useless. Have hobbies, lots and lots of time for sex…..and she had better be submissive and be “really” into it! Have other hobbies, have time to hang with like minded men and do “manly” activities together. Church / realted church stuff ALL DAY Sunday.
Cant do this? “you dont know how to budget your time / just lazy / dont want to put the work in / you obviously like being Blue Pilled”
Its like helicopter parenting. Every second of the day has to and must be budgeted….because we all know….every SECOND your wife isnt being watched or called out…she’s working out details to divorce you / upsur your authority.
So much for love
Right, this is not bold leadership or authority, it is mothering, (or “micromanaging”). These men want to mother their wives. It’s very effeminate!
Frankly, I think ~98% of men would find this terribly exhausting and a horrible life experience. I think that’s why the Red Pill gets so few devotees. Sure, many like some of its factual observations and scathing social criticisms, but they don’t actually want a Red Pill relationship because it is gay, to channel a bit of Tim Walz:
I thought that perhaps Catacomb Resident has such an unusual relationship with his wife because he doesn’t have children. It’s easy for a husband and wife to constantly fawn over their looks (including clothing choices) when they are young or childless.
But, of course, helicopter parents exist as a parents-with-children example of over-mothering.
Exhausting.
So much for trust too.